Melanesia vs Polynesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Melanesia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 134.28 t against -2,819 t in Melanesia, a difference of 2,953 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 11th and Polynesia ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2,685 t | -987.81 t | 1,697 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | -2,014 t | -816.35 t | 1,198 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | -1,143 t | -130.86 t | 1,012 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | -217.3 t | 362.58 t | 579.88 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | -942.01 t | 208.31 t | 1,150 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | -2,520 t | 180.87 t | 2,701 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | -1,683 t | 191.85 t | 1,874 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Melanesia or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 134.28 t against -2,819 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Melanesia and Polynesia?
- 2,953 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Polynesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Melanesia ranks 11th and Polynesia ranks 9th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).