Mexico vs Thailand: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mexico
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 107,984 t against 100,045 t in Mexico, a difference of 7,939 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.
Mexico ranks 14th and Thailand ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1,013 t | 4,609 t | 5,621 t | Thailand |
| 1970s | 48,233 t | 13,857 t | 34,376 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 106,275 t | 14,483 t | 91,791 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 66,101 t | 111,229 t | 45,128 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 54,119 t | 63,729 t | 9,610 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 67,831 t | 62,603 t | 5,228 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 92,689 t | 70,445 t | 22,244 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Mexico or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 107,984 t against 100,045 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Mexico and Thailand?
- 7,939 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Thailand rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Mexico ranks 14th and Thailand ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).