Myanmar vs Paraguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Myanmar
- Paraguay
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports -11,305 t against -15,248 t in Paraguay, a difference of 3,943 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 175th and Paraguay ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 4 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,281 t | 1,133 t | 5,148 t | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 12,847 t | -1,483 t | 14,330 t | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 14,131 t | -6,042 t | 20,173 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 1,715 t | -6,648 t | 8,363 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | -41,399 t | 9,338 t | 50,737 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | -13,072 t | 611.09 t | 13,683 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | -15,025 t | -6,151 t | 8,873 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Myanmar or Paraguay?
- Myanmar, at -11,305 t against -15,248 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 3,943 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Paraguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Paraguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Myanmar ranks 175th and Paraguay ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).