Northern Europe vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Northern Europe
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 71,721 t against 56,249 t in Northern Europe, a difference of 15,472 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.3 times Northern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Northern Europe ahead.
Northern Europe ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 29 groups.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Europe | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 240,936 t | 42,875 t | 198,062 t | Northern Europe |
| 2000s | 140,836 t | 25,702 t | 115,134 t | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 90,323 t | 50,337 t | 39,986 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 66,519 t | 58,338 t | 8,181 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Northern Europe or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 71,721 t against 56,249 t in Northern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Northern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 15,472 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Europe and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Northern Europe ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).