Paraguay vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Paraguay
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports -15,248 t against -16,205 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 957 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Paraguay ranks 178th and Sri Lanka ranks 180th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,133 t | 2,293 t | 1,160 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | -1,483 t | 1,047 t | 2,530 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | -6,042 t | 5,355 t | 11,398 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | -6,648 t | 722.06 t | 7,370 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 9,338 t | 260.07 t | 9,078 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 611.09 t | -833.92 t | 1,445 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | -6,151 t | -12,826 t | 6,675 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Paraguay or Sri Lanka?
- Paraguay, at -15,248 t against -16,205 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Paraguay and Sri Lanka?
- 957 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Paraguay ranks 178th and Sri Lanka ranks 180th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).