Poland vs Uruguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Poland
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 31,493 t against 26,777 t in Poland, a difference of 4,716 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 173,067 t | 13,354 t | 159,713 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 374,056 t | 19,250 t | 354,806 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 369,748 t | 15,644 t | 354,104 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 106,213 t | 21,711 t | 84,502 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 129,314 t | 28,315 t | 100,999 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 102,291 t | 33,776 t | 68,515 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 52,159 t | 33,166 t | 18,993 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Poland or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 31,493 t against 26,777 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Poland and Uruguay?
- 4,716 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Uruguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Poland ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).