Polynesia vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Polynesia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 138,874 t against 134.28 t in Polynesia, a difference of 138,740 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1,034.2 times Polynesia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 9th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 9th of 18 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -987.81 t | 167,616 t | 168,604 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -816.35 t | 217,622 t | 218,438 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -130.86 t | 274,219 t | 274,349 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 344.9 t | 176,722 t | 176,377 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Polynesia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 138,874 t against 134.28 t in Polynesia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Polynesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 138,740 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Polynesia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Polynesia ranks 9th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 9th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).