Portugal vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Portugal
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16,935 t against 16,094 t in Portugal, a difference of 841 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30,221 t | 12,680 t | 17,540 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 25,700 t | 11,348 t | 14,352 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 19,222 t | 14,085 t | 5,138 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Portugal or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16,935 t against 16,094 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Portugal and Serbia?
- 841 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Portugal and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Portugal ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).