Puerto Rico vs Qatar: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Puerto Rico
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1,045 t against 922.11 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 122.89 t.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 95th and Qatar ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -555.18 t | 15.69 t | 570.87 t | Qatar |
| 1970s | 1,380 t | 22.44 t | 1,358 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 1,685 t | 44.91 t | 1,640 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 1,804 t | 67.86 t | 1,736 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 1,318 t | 75.84 t | 1,242 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 1,580 t | 465.12 t | 1,115 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 1,021 t | 1,064 t | 42.98 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Puerto Rico or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 1,045 t against 922.11 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 122.89 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Qatar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Puerto Rico ranks 95th and Qatar ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).