Republic of Moldova vs Thailand: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 107,984 t against -3,173 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 111,157 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 34.0 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 11th of 18 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,898 t | 118,680 t | 108,782 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | -4,607 t | 63,729 t | 68,336 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | -916.46 t | 62,603 t | 63,519 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | -412.58 t | 70,445 t | 70,857 t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Republic of Moldova or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 107,984 t against -3,173 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 111,157 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Thailand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Thailand rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 11th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).