Russian Federation vs Senegal: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Russian Federation
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports -11,531 t against -15,797 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 4,266 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 179th and Senegal ranks 176th of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 411,400 t | -134.91 t | 411,535 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 118,652 t | -1,248 t | 119,900 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 77,877 t | -1,583 t | 79,460 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 20,028 t | -9,986 t | 30,014 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Russian Federation or Senegal?
- Senegal, at -11,531 t against -15,797 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Russian Federation and Senegal?
- 4,266 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Senegal rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Russian Federation ranks 179th and Senegal ranks 176th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).