Serbia vs Tunisia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16,935 t against 15,892 t in Tunisia, a difference of 1,043 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,680 t | 4,051 t | 8,629 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 11,348 t | 9,072 t | 2,276 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 14,085 t | 8,984 t | 5,101 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Serbia, at 16,935 t against 15,892 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 1,043 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Serbia ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).