Serbia, Republic of vs Turkmenistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Serbia, Republic of
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 18,404 t against 16,935 t in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 1,469 t.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia, Republic of ahead.
Serbia, Republic of ranks 42nd and Turkmenistan ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Serbia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia, Republic of | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,680 t | 695.47 t | 11,985 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 11,348 t | 7,054 t | 4,294 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 14,085 t | 12,006 t | 2,078 t | Serbia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Serbia, Republic of or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 18,404 t against 16,935 t in Serbia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Serbia, Republic of and Turkmenistan?
- 1,469 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia, Republic of and Turkmenistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia, Republic of and Turkmenistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Serbia, Republic of ranks 42nd and Turkmenistan ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).