South Sudan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- South Sudan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2,433 t against 2,307 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 126 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,519 t | 1,929 t | 590.28 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 2,787 t | 2,240 t | 547.12 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, South Sudan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Sudan, at 2,433 t against 2,307 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 126 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- South Sudan ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).