Sudan vs Syrian Arab Republic: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sudan
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports -16,540 t against -18,553 t in Sudan, a difference of 2,013 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 183rd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 181st of 201 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -20,491 t | -16,904 t | 3,587 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | -25,896 t | -15,015 t | 10,881 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Sudan or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at -16,540 t against -18,553 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2,013 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Sudan ranks 183rd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 181st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).