Uzbekistan vs Western Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Uzbekistan
- Western Europe
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 71,721 t against 61,194 t in Western Europe, a difference of 10,527 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Western Europe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Western Europe ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 17th and Western Europe ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Western Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,875 t | 661,289 t | 618,414 t | Western Europe |
| 2000s | 25,702 t | 341,384 t | 315,682 t | Western Europe |
| 2010s | 50,337 t | 208,676 t | 158,339 t | Western Europe |
| 2020s | 58,338 t | 107,389 t | 49,050 t | Western Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Uzbekistan or Western Europe?
- Uzbekistan, at 71,721 t against 61,194 t in Western Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Uzbekistan and Western Europe?
- 10,527 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Western Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uzbekistan and Western Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Uzbekistan ranks 17th and Western Europe ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).