Afghanistan vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Afghanistan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 5.21 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Afghanistan, a difference of 1.27 kg/ha.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Afghanistan's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 96th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 kg/ha | 22.12 kg/ha | 18.12 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5.19 kg/ha | 16.1 kg/ha | 10.91 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 4.04 kg/ha | 11.46 kg/ha | 7.42 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Afghanistan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 5.21 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Afghanistan and Serbia?
- 1.27 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Afghanistan ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 96th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).