Asia vs Malta: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Asia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 123.48 kg/ha against 9.99 kg/ha in Asia, a difference of 113.49 kg/ha.
That makes Malta's figure about 12.4 times Asia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 10th and Malta ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.3 kg/ha | 36.48 kg/ha | 33.18 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 3.54 kg/ha | 66.64 kg/ha | 63.1 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 4.36 kg/ha | 101.39 kg/ha | 97.03 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 5.96 kg/ha | 135.87 kg/ha | 129.9 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 8.7 kg/ha | 151.35 kg/ha | 142.65 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 11.77 kg/ha | 99.78 kg/ha | 88.01 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 10.72 kg/ha | 120.29 kg/ha | 109.57 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Asia or Malta?
- Malta, at 123.48 kg/ha against 9.99 kg/ha in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Asia and Malta?
- 113.49 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Malta rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Asia ranks 10th and Malta ranks 13th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).