Australia and New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Australia and New Zealand
-7.86 kg/ha
in 2023
Sierra Leone
-7.8 kg/ha
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
153rd
Sierra Leone rank
152nd

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sierra Leone
-10-50510196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports -7.8 kg/ha against -7.86 kg/ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 153rd and Sierra Leone ranks 152nd of 186 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 5 kg/ha -7.49 kg/ha 12.49 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
1970s 7.46 kg/ha -7.23 kg/ha 14.68 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
1980s 2.85 kg/ha -7.03 kg/ha 9.88 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1.72 kg/ha -6.64 kg/ha 8.36 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.7399 kg/ha -6.83 kg/ha 7.57 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s -1.76 kg/ha -8.27 kg/ha 6.51 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s -3.39 kg/ha -7.71 kg/ha 4.31 kg/ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Australia and New Zealand or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at -7.8 kg/ha against -7.86 kg/ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
0.06 kg/ha, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sierra Leone rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 153rd and Sierra Leone ranks 152nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/australia-and-new-zealand/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/australia-and-new-zealand/sierra-leone/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sierra Leone: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).