Bahamas vs Czechoslovakia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bahamas
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports -0.4421 kg/ha against -0.6864 kg/ha in Bahamas, a difference of 0.2443 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 113th and Czechoslovakia ranks 111th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Czechoslovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28.81 kg/ha | 20.52 kg/ha | 8.29 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 1970s | 35.79 kg/ha | 35.74 kg/ha | 0.053 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 14.55 kg/ha | 32.23 kg/ha | 17.68 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 9.79 kg/ha | 7.22 kg/ha | 2.56 kg/ha | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Bahamas or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at -0.4421 kg/ha against -0.6864 kg/ha in Bahamas as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Bahamas and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.2443 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Bahamas and Czechoslovakia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bahamas ranks 113th and Czechoslovakia ranks 111th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).