Belarus vs Luxembourg: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 85.57 kg/ha against 75.35 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 10.22 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Belarus ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.21 kg/ha | 87.58 kg/ha | 13.37 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 81.2 kg/ha | 85.52 kg/ha | 4.32 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 74.24 kg/ha | 84.68 kg/ha | 10.44 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 85.57 kg/ha against 75.35 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Luxembourg?
- 10.22 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Luxembourg rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 20th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).