Benin vs India: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Benin
- India
How they compare
India currently reports -11.59 kg/ha against -12.81 kg/ha in Benin, a difference of 1.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.
Benin ranks 176th and India ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2.52 kg/ha | 2.11 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | India |
| 1970s | -2.11 kg/ha | 2.27 kg/ha | 4.38 kg/ha | India |
| 1980s | -2.26 kg/ha | 3.55 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | India |
| 1990s | -5.71 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | 7.34 kg/ha | India |
| 2000s | -8.43 kg/ha | 3.11 kg/ha | 11.54 kg/ha | India |
| 2010s | -10.56 kg/ha | -3.87 kg/ha | 6.69 kg/ha | India |
| 2020s | -9.42 kg/ha | -8.44 kg/ha | 0.9719 kg/ha | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Benin or India?
- India, at -11.59 kg/ha against -12.81 kg/ha in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Benin and India?
- 1.22 kg/ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Benin and India rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Benin ranks 176th and India ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).