Cambodia vs Czechoslovakia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.3727 kg/ha against -0.4421 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.8148 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 114th and Czechoslovakia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Czechoslovakia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.47 kg/ha | 20.52 kg/ha | 7.06 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 20.22 kg/ha | 35.74 kg/ha | 15.52 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 14.34 kg/ha | 32.23 kg/ha | 17.89 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 14.64 kg/ha | 7.22 kg/ha | 7.41 kg/ha | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Cambodia or Czechoslovakia?
- Cambodia, at 0.3727 kg/ha against -0.4421 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.8148 kg/ha, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cambodia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 114th and Czechoslovakia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).