Central Asia vs Montenegro: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Central Asia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 411.45 kg/ha against 16.47 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 394.98 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 25.0 times Central Asia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 8th and Montenegro ranks 4th of 38 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.8 kg/ha | 620.83 kg/ha | 612.03 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 12.21 kg/ha | 510.41 kg/ha | 498.2 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 14.72 kg/ha | 422.24 kg/ha | 407.52 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Central Asia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 411.45 kg/ha against 16.47 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Central Asia and Montenegro?
- 394.98 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Central Asia ranks 8th and Montenegro ranks 4th of 38 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).