China, Hong Kong SAR vs European Union (27): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

China, Hong Kong SAR
216.26 kg/ha
in 2023
European Union (27)
28.54 kg/ha
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
6th
European Union (27) rank
4th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • European Union (27)
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 216.26 kg/ha against 28.54 kg/ha in European Union (27), a difference of 187.72 kg/ha.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 7.6 times European Union (27)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was European Union (27) ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 6th and European Union (27) ranks 4th of 186 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR European Union (27) Difference Ahead
1960s 68.68 kg/ha 56.23 kg/ha 12.44 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 131.68 kg/ha 75.22 kg/ha 56.47 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 169.85 kg/ha 76.82 kg/ha 93.04 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 98.31 kg/ha 49.18 kg/ha 49.14 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 113.39 kg/ha 38.12 kg/ha 75.27 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 165.6 kg/ha 33.49 kg/ha 132.11 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 218.38 kg/ha 30.9 kg/ha 187.49 kg/ha China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, China, Hong Kong SAR or European Union (27)?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 216.26 kg/ha against 28.54 kg/ha in European Union (27) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between China, Hong Kong SAR and European Union (27)?
187.72 kg/ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and European Union (27)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and European Union (27) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 6th and European Union (27) ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs European Union (27): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/china-hong-kong-sar/european-union-27/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/china-hong-kong-sar/european-union-27/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs European Union (27): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).