Cuba vs Niger: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Niger
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -1.99 kg/ha against -2.52 kg/ha in Niger, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Niger ahead.
Cuba ranks 130th and Niger ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Niger in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.3 kg/ha | -0.0552 kg/ha | 16.36 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 15.17 kg/ha | -0.006 kg/ha | 15.18 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 30.63 kg/ha | -0.2065 kg/ha | 30.84 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 4.68 kg/ha | -0.3388 kg/ha | 5.02 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | -1.88 kg/ha | -0.8092 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Niger |
| 2010s | -1.34 kg/ha | -2.12 kg/ha | 0.7791 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | -2.86 kg/ha | -2.34 kg/ha | 0.5213 kg/ha | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Niger?
- Cuba, at -1.99 kg/ha against -2.52 kg/ha in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Niger?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Niger?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Niger rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 130th and Niger ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).