Cuba vs Togo: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports -1.68 kg/ha against -1.99 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Cuba ranks 130th and Togo ranks 127th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.3 kg/ha | -1.83 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 15.17 kg/ha | -1.82 kg/ha | 16.99 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 30.63 kg/ha | -1.66 kg/ha | 32.29 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 4.68 kg/ha | -2.38 kg/ha | 7.06 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | -1.88 kg/ha | -2.86 kg/ha | 0.9812 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | -1.34 kg/ha | -1.52 kg/ha | 0.1831 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | -2.86 kg/ha | -2.64 kg/ha | 0.2264 kg/ha | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Togo?
- Togo, at -1.68 kg/ha against -1.99 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Togo?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 130th and Togo ranks 127th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).