Cyprus vs Kyrgyzstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 36.33 kg/ha against 33.56 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 2.77 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cyprus ranks 45th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.76 kg/ha | 22.99 kg/ha | 8.23 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 23.16 kg/ha | 15.87 kg/ha | 7.29 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 37.52 kg/ha | 27.59 kg/ha | 9.93 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 36.64 kg/ha | 35.79 kg/ha | 0.8459 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Cyprus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 36.33 kg/ha against 33.56 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.77 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 45th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).