Czechoslovakia vs Gabon: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Gabon
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports -0.4421 kg/ha against -0.5189 kg/ha in Gabon, a difference of 0.0768 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 117th and Gabon ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.52 kg/ha | -1.86 kg/ha | 22.39 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 35.74 kg/ha | -1.51 kg/ha | 37.25 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 32.23 kg/ha | -1.75 kg/ha | 33.98 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 7.22 kg/ha | -2.61 kg/ha | 9.84 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Gabon?
- Czechoslovakia, at -0.4421 kg/ha against -0.5189 kg/ha in Gabon as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Gabon?
- 0.0768 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Gabon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Gabon rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 117th and Gabon ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).