Eastern Asia vs Montenegro: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eastern Asia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 411.45 kg/ha against 37.68 kg/ha in Eastern Asia, a difference of 373.77 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 10.9 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 29 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.46 kg/ha | 620.83 kg/ha | 596.37 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 37.08 kg/ha | 510.41 kg/ha | 473.33 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 36.24 kg/ha | 422.24 kg/ha | 386 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Eastern Asia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 411.45 kg/ha against 37.68 kg/ha in Eastern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Eastern Asia and Montenegro?
- 373.77 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eastern Asia ranks 3rd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).