El Salvador vs Lithuania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- El Salvador
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 10.91 kg/ha against 10.24 kg/ha in El Salvador, a difference of 0.67 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
El Salvador ranks 82nd and Lithuania ranks 80th of 185 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.42 kg/ha | 25.66 kg/ha | 19.24 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 4 kg/ha | 28.29 kg/ha | 24.29 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 9.81 kg/ha | 19.35 kg/ha | 9.54 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 11.27 kg/ha | 12.83 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, El Salvador or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 10.91 kg/ha against 10.24 kg/ha in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between El Salvador and Lithuania?
- 0.67 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- El Salvador ranks 82nd and Lithuania ranks 80th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).