Eritrea vs Georgia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Georgia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 6.6 kg/ha against 6.09 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.51 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 94th and Georgia ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.19 kg/ha | -0.2049 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 5.53 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | 3.58 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 6.25 kg/ha | 4.41 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 6.59 kg/ha | 5.48 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Georgia?
- Eritrea, at 6.6 kg/ha against 6.09 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Georgia?
- 0.51 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Georgia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Georgia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 94th and Georgia ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).