Estonia vs Honduras: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 25.8 kg/ha against 22.12 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 3.68 kg/ha.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 58th and Honduras ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.78 kg/ha | 6.45 kg/ha | 29.33 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 32.45 kg/ha | 7.71 kg/ha | 24.75 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 30.07 kg/ha | 19.45 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 24.84 kg/ha | 27.01 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 25.8 kg/ha against 22.12 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Honduras?
- 3.68 kg/ha, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Honduras?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Honduras rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 58th and Honduras ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).