Ethiopia PDR vs Morocco: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Morocco
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports -2.57 kg/ha against -2.94 kg/ha in Morocco, a difference of 0.37 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 133rd and Morocco ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.61 kg/ha | -1.21 kg/ha | 0.3983 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1970s | -1.99 kg/ha | -0.9282 kg/ha | 1.06 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1980s | -2.87 kg/ha | -0.4592 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 1990s | -3.05 kg/ha | -0.9438 kg/ha | 2.11 kg/ha | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Morocco?
- Ethiopia PDR, at -2.57 kg/ha against -2.94 kg/ha in Morocco as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Morocco?
- 0.37 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Morocco rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 133rd and Morocco ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).