French Polynesia vs Ukraine: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- French Polynesia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports -8.58 kg/ha against -8.69 kg/ha in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 166th and Ukraine ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.39 kg/ha | 23.62 kg/ha | 26.01 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2000s | -2.77 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | 7.93 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2010s | -4.65 kg/ha | -2.7 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2020s | -6.17 kg/ha | -5.77 kg/ha | 0.3996 kg/ha | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, French Polynesia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at -8.58 kg/ha against -8.69 kg/ha in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between French Polynesia and Ukraine?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Ukraine rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- French Polynesia ranks 166th and Ukraine ranks 164th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).