Hungary vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Hungary
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.2 kg/ha against 0.7 kg/ha in Hungary, a difference of 1.5 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 3.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 111th and Kazakhstan ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.37 kg/ha | 5.27 kg/ha | 4.1 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 8.53 kg/ha | 3.02 kg/ha | 5.51 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 8.11 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | 5.35 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 10.06 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | 8.43 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Hungary or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.2 kg/ha against 0.7 kg/ha in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Hungary and Kazakhstan?
- 1.5 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Hungary ranks 111th and Kazakhstan ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).