Iceland vs Tajikistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iceland
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 59.98 kg/ha against 58.06 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.92 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 27th and Tajikistan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.06 kg/ha | 28.68 kg/ha | 35.38 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 58.76 kg/ha | 29.88 kg/ha | 28.88 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 71 kg/ha | 54.88 kg/ha | 16.12 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 66.54 kg/ha | 59.43 kg/ha | 7.11 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Iceland or Tajikistan?
- Iceland, at 59.98 kg/ha against 58.06 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Iceland and Tajikistan?
- 1.92 kg/ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iceland ranks 27th and Tajikistan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).