Indonesia vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Indonesia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 2.62 kg/ha against 2.2 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Indonesia ranks 101st and Kazakhstan ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.86 kg/ha | 5.27 kg/ha | 7.13 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | -2.1 kg/ha | 3.02 kg/ha | 5.12 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 8.67 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | 5.91 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 7.44 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Indonesia or Kazakhstan?
- Indonesia, at 2.62 kg/ha against 2.2 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Indonesia ranks 101st and Kazakhstan ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).