Indonesia vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Indonesia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 2.79 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Indonesia, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 101st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.759 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | 8.24 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -2.59 kg/ha | 9.04 kg/ha | 11.63 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -0.5057 kg/ha | 10.25 kg/ha | 10.75 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 1.52 kg/ha | 5.62 kg/ha | 4.1 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Indonesia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 2.79 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Indonesia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Indonesia ranks 101st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).