Kenya vs Mexico: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -4.83 kg/ha against -5.73 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.9 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 145th and Mexico ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.84 kg/ha | -2.78 kg/ha | 0.9411 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | -2.7 kg/ha | -2.08 kg/ha | 0.629 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1980s | -2.57 kg/ha | -1.91 kg/ha | 0.6522 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1990s | -4.11 kg/ha | -2.21 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | -7.12 kg/ha | -1.74 kg/ha | 5.38 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2010s | -7.22 kg/ha | -1.85 kg/ha | 5.37 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2020s | -7.44 kg/ha | -2.94 kg/ha | 4.51 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Kenya or Mexico?
- Mexico, at -4.83 kg/ha against -5.73 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Kenya and Mexico?
- 0.9 kg/ha, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kenya ranks 145th and Mexico ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).