Kuwait vs Montenegro: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kuwait
- Montenegro
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 548.14 kg/ha against 411.45 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 136.69 kg/ha.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Kuwait ranks 2nd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.63 kg/ha | 620.83 kg/ha | 515.2 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 321.54 kg/ha | 510.41 kg/ha | 188.87 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 498.81 kg/ha | 422.24 kg/ha | 76.57 kg/ha | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Kuwait or Montenegro?
- Kuwait, at 548.14 kg/ha against 411.45 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Kuwait and Montenegro?
- 136.69 kg/ha, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kuwait ranks 2nd and Montenegro ranks 4th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).