Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.57 kg/ha
in 2023
Republic of Korea
90.73 kg/ha
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
16th
Republic of Korea rank
17th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Republic of Korea
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 90.73 kg/ha against 2.57 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 88.16 kg/ha.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 35.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Republic of Korea ranks 17th of 29 groups.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 4.57 kg/ha 4.94 kg/ha 0.3692 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1970s 4.64 kg/ha 33.43 kg/ha 28.79 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1980s 5.52 kg/ha 71.28 kg/ha 65.76 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1990s 3.76 kg/ha 105.65 kg/ha 101.89 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2000s 2.05 kg/ha 82.11 kg/ha 80.06 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2010s 2.35 kg/ha 89.88 kg/ha 87.52 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2020s 2.52 kg/ha 91.92 kg/ha 89.4 kg/ha Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 90.73 kg/ha against 2.57 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea?
88.16 kg/ha, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Republic of Korea ranks 17th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-korea/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).