Lithuania vs Saudi Arabia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 10.91 kg/ha against 10.04 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.87 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.66 kg/ha | -2.54 kg/ha | 28.2 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 28.29 kg/ha | -0.5859 kg/ha | 28.88 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 19.35 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | 16.06 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 12.83 kg/ha | 11.46 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Lithuania or Saudi Arabia?
- Lithuania, at 10.91 kg/ha against 10.04 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.87 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 84th and Saudi Arabia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).