Malaysia vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malaysia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 82.28 kg/ha against 73.6 kg/ha in Malaysia, a difference of 8.68 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.64 kg/ha | 16.93 kg/ha | 31.71 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 43.43 kg/ha | 16.94 kg/ha | 26.5 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 59.06 kg/ha | 50.49 kg/ha | 8.57 kg/ha | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 53.44 kg/ha | 73.95 kg/ha | 20.51 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Malaysia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 82.28 kg/ha against 73.6 kg/ha in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 8.68 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malaysia ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).