Mexico vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mexico
- Uganda
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -4.83 kg/ha against -5.51 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.68 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 146th and Uganda ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2.78 kg/ha | -9.2 kg/ha | 6.42 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1970s | -2.08 kg/ha | -13.29 kg/ha | 11.21 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1980s | -1.91 kg/ha | -8.98 kg/ha | 7.07 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1990s | -2.21 kg/ha | -9.32 kg/ha | 7.11 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | -1.74 kg/ha | -8.98 kg/ha | 7.24 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2010s | -1.85 kg/ha | -4.05 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2020s | -2.94 kg/ha | -5.95 kg/ha | 3.01 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Mexico or Uganda?
- Mexico, at -4.83 kg/ha against -5.51 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Mexico and Uganda?
- 0.68 kg/ha, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mexico ranks 146th and Uganda ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).