Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-0.4197 kg/ha
in 2023
Slovenia
91.05 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
9th
Slovenia rank
16th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Slovenia
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 91.05 kg/ha against -0.4197 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 91.47 kg/ha.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 216.9 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 9th and Slovenia ranks 16th of 10 groups.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9054 kg/ha 160.56 kg/ha 159.65 kg/ha Slovenia
2000s -0.0728 kg/ha 137.16 kg/ha 137.23 kg/ha Slovenia
2010s 0.1607 kg/ha 94.27 kg/ha 94.11 kg/ha Slovenia
2020s -0.0717 kg/ha 88.11 kg/ha 88.18 kg/ha Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 91.05 kg/ha against -0.4197 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Slovenia?
91.47 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 9th and Slovenia ranks 16th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/slovenia/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).