Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Republic of Korea
90.73 kg/ha
in 2023
United States of America
3.94 kg/ha
in 2023
Republic of Korea rank
17th
United States of America rank
15th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • United States of America
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 90.73 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in United States of America, a difference of 86.79 kg/ha.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 23.0 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 17th and United States of America ranks 15th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 6 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 4.94 kg/ha 15.11 kg/ha 10.17 kg/ha United States of America
1970s 33.43 kg/ha 17.48 kg/ha 15.95 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1980s 71.28 kg/ha 15.63 kg/ha 55.65 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1990s 105.65 kg/ha 11.9 kg/ha 93.76 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2000s 82.11 kg/ha 8.23 kg/ha 73.88 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2010s 89.88 kg/ha 5.52 kg/ha 84.36 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2020s 91.92 kg/ha 4.04 kg/ha 87.87 kg/ha Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Republic of Korea or United States of America?
Republic of Korea, at 90.73 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Republic of Korea and United States of America?
86.79 kg/ha, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Republic of Korea and United States of America rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Republic of Korea ranks 17th and United States of America ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/republic-of-korea/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/republic-of-korea/united-states-of-america/">Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).