Suriname vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Suriname
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 3.02 kg/ha against 2.79 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Suriname ranks 97th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -3.65 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | 11.13 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | -6.73 kg/ha | 9.04 kg/ha | 15.77 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.7779 kg/ha | 10.25 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 1.8 kg/ha | 5.62 kg/ha | 3.82 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Suriname or Yugoslav SFR?
- Suriname, at 3.02 kg/ha against 2.79 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Suriname and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Suriname and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Suriname ranks 97th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).