Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Syrian Arab Republic
-8.78 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
-6.93 kg/ha
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
13th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-15-10-50196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports -6.93 kg/ha against -8.78 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 1.85 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 18 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -3.58 kg/ha -1.83 kg/ha 1.74 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s -4.7 kg/ha -2.4 kg/ha 2.3 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -6.68 kg/ha -3.12 kg/ha 3.56 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -10.86 kg/ha -3.39 kg/ha 7.47 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2000s -13.53 kg/ha -5.24 kg/ha 8.29 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -8.8 kg/ha -7.83 kg/ha 0.9667 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -7.69 kg/ha -6.8 kg/ha 0.8944 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at -6.93 kg/ha against -8.78 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.85 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).