Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area

Tunisia
-4.07 kg/ha
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-4.65 kg/ha
in 2023
Tunisia rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
-5051015196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports -4.07 kg/ha against -4.65 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tunisia ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 201 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s -0.8672 kg/ha 7.46 kg/ha 8.32 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1970s -1.51 kg/ha 7.51 kg/ha 9.02 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1980s -2.08 kg/ha 2.36 kg/ha 4.44 kg/ha Zimbabwe
1990s -3.53 kg/ha 2.68 kg/ha 6.21 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2000s -3.04 kg/ha -1.31 kg/ha 1.73 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2010s -4.14 kg/ha -0.3154 kg/ha 3.83 kg/ha Zimbabwe
2020s -4.57 kg/ha -3.88 kg/ha 0.6852 kg/ha Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Tunisia, at -4.07 kg/ha against -4.65 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
0.58 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium per unit area?
Tunisia ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).